Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
adrienne
@adrienne
I’m on farcaster because I think digital property rights are worth fighting for. Full stop.
16 replies
21 recasts
139 reactions
Trish🫧
@trish
I don’t understand this. How does farcaster facilitate digital ownership in a way that would feel meaningful to any curious person coming in off the street?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Your social primitives (posts, follows, following, social graph) are owned by you and readable by any fc client This is in contrast to all other forms of social media in web2
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trish🫧
@trish
I understand that part. What I’m trying to say is that ownership is meaningless if activity on the protocol reaps no rewards?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Hmm I don’t think ownership is meaningless without protocol rewards. The fact that it facilitates ownership in and of itself is by far better than the status quo. It also enables other protocol rewards to build predictably on the farcaster protocol, which indirectly brings the rewards to participants. Effectively, the reduction of platform risk that we haven’t seen on social media for 15 years
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trish🫧
@trish
Sorry I was not clear. I didn’t mean token or monetary rewards. By “rewards” I meant their ability to get a foothold on the platform and build a following. It’s tough in any circumstance but especially tough here. On top of that what they see and how they are treated when they join isn’t great.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Ahh I see, you mean more of the social network rewards as a social capital element Yeah that’s fair. I’m hoping the upcoming shift to channels gives people more of a chance to be seen by the niches (channel topics) they care about, since visibility will be controlled more by the channel host than the global Warpcast
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
