Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
This is a ridiculous & unconstitutional policy, all of this was possible before AI. The state will manufacture outrage wildly out of proportion to any real & present danger in order to destroy 1st Amendment protections. Deep fakes, like all parody, are free speech: full stop. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/17/technology/california-deepfakes-law-social-media-newsom.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Lk4.sJNI.9vkLVQbMbc8w&smid=url-share
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
alixkun🟣🎩🍡
@alixkun
Don't you think there are levels to this though? Grouping deep fakes with parody is a bit dishonest in this case imo. Parody is supposed to make you laugh and often exist within a context (an identified parody account, a parody TV show, etc...). A Deepfake is used by legitimate accounts to manipulate people. Clearly not the same stakes here. The degree is different too. Photography was a major revolution in the realm of portraying Vs painting. Deepfake is of the same nature in the realm of creating "fake" content. Parody requires wearing costumes, imitating voices etc...Deepfake is way beyond that.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Trish🫧
@trish
They know.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
What's with the sass and the QT dunking? I must really deserve it because clearly I'm being factious and cynical and this is not my actual opinion after years of studying cypherpunk history. 🙄
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
