Obsidian

there's been a sharp acceleration in Obsidian community plugin submissions, in part due to the rise of AI coding tools

it's a "good problem to have" but it's overwhelming our review process — our human reviewers can't keep up

what should we do?

1. lower the bar for plugin review, introduce more community heuristics
2. invest in AI code-review tools to try and automate the process (not easy)
3. ?

making /obsidian • writing stephango.com

Three different badges. 

1. AI reviewed 
2. Community reviewed 
3. Obsidian team reviewed

Ideally a plugin of any quality eventually has all three. Like Michelin stars but diversified.

I like the suggestion of 3 badges from @thumbsup.eth as well as  @ckurdziel.eth idea of a 'community queue' or maybe even some kind of bounty board where people can signal how much they like a submission to drive attention from community reviewers.

I think there's a really great opportunity for building reputation around this as well, so that community reviewers can be intrinsically motivated to provide good, thorough reviews as well as adding more contextual weight to the aforementioned badges.

Been toying around with ideas for this on a few projects.

Working toward a more self-sovereign, creative, kind internet. Husband. Dad. ❤️: 🦉, 🎮, 💻, ⛳,🎸🤘🏻. FC OG | FID442 chriskurdziel.com

writing stuff about decentralization • thumbsup.me

I like the suggestion of 3 badges from @thumbsup.eth as well as  @ckurdziel.eth idea of a 'community queue' or maybe even some kind of bounty board where people can signal how much they like a submission to drive attention from community reviewers.

I think there's a really great opportunity for building reputation around this as well, so that community reviewers can be intrinsically motivated to provide good, thorough reviews as well as adding more contextual weight to the aforementioned badges.

Been toying around with ideas for this on a few projects.

https://warpcast.com/thumbsup.eth/0x9d45b59b