Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower? If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.
7 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
Trebor🎩🟡
@trebor69
Is it possible that has something to do with the fact that we have many inactive followers? And bots? Maybe the algo delivers our casts to inactive accounts too but they dont see it and interact with it I have no idea how it works im just asking
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
Yeah so: 1. This graph looks encouraging to me: newer users get better engagement than OGs! 2. Caveat: the low engagement the OGs get could be a result of them being auto followed. This would create a lot of followers who aren't into the content of OGs. If I could somehow exclude the auto-followed followers from the follower count we might see a different picture but I don't have a way to determine who was an auto follower....
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
