Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
winnie
@winnie
maybe crypto ux doesnt need to be good after all 🤪 … we were so hung up on improving the UX for humans to transact onchain that we traded off interoperability and decentralization. for instance, the introduction of embedded wallets made consumers create new wallets with every new app they signed up with, thereby removing their previous transaction history and onchain identity/reputation. however, we’re getting to a world where a collective of agents will be better, faster, and more efficient at transacting across multiple apps/ecosystems than a human ever will be. agents won’t care if they need to sign multiple steps… and will be much faster than humans at it.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
tomu
@tomu
even without agents, the native crypto apps that got the most user had the worst ux build for natives - build smth weird build for normies - build with ux in mind wrote about this some weeks ago https://tomu.xyz/not-every-product-needs-to-onboard-normies
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
winnie
@winnie
loved this and say this all the time. in fact, i think apps that try to target both tend to be less successful. on one hand, you have bigger TAM, lower willingness to pay. on the crypto native side, less users but much deeper pockets and willingness to experiment
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
