Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
Projects that applied but do not meet the eligibility criteria on OP Retro Funding 4. https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-4-eligibility-criteria-enforcement/8303
4 replies
3 recasts
15 reactions
seneca
@seneca
rounds rektd
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨
@toadyhawk.eth
No way. Clearly FIDs aren’t being counted as unique addresses? How did they come up with 5 uniques, rounds must have dispersed funds to thousands of wallets by now.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Fractal Visions ⌐◨-◨
@fractalvisions.eth
Curious 🧐 how rounds work in frame. If folks are claiming the funds but not actually signing any Tx where is the interaction happening onchain? If that’s the user journey & a backend engine is generating the Txs it make sense why it’s not flush with stats from users. Farcaster needs its own Retro OP round FR!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
The period counted was from Jan 1 to May 1. I don't remember the timing if Rounds, it feels like it's been with us forever.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
