tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
I’m actually curious about this: Is it “worse” for an OP to get quote-casted than replied to? I love when people quote cast me and think it’s often a more interesting commentary than a reply. It seems like a better distribution of the OP too(?)
9 replies
6 recasts
67 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
lol did you miss the entire reply vs quote cast meta??? yikes personally i appreciate and desire replies more than quote casts, unless it is a quote cast for amplification. what drew me and kept me on farcaster and many other early users was conversations, which is where it is easier to make friends. connection vs. broadcast. *opinions expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer*
5 replies
1 recast
40 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
I saw a little bit of it yesterday from an exchange by Kenny and Dan on one of my comments. Here’s what I came to: https://warpcast.com/tldr/0x1ff0fbba
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
will say that the conversation about reply bumping focuses mostly on the feed experience, and doesn't consider other important aspects of replies + NUX: 1. good threaded (vs linear) convos make it easier for users to follow and participate in discussions, fostering sense of community (better for retention) 2. replies facilitate direct itneraction b/w users, leading to more meaningful and satisfying engagements that make users feel valued (better for retention) 3. users who receive replies perceive a platform as more interactive, socially present, and community-oriented, enhancing the likelihood they'll continue to engage (better for retention) there is research around all of this. again, just my personal POV as someone who spends a lot of time across many social apps.
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
