Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Why did you rename frames to mini apps? Why not just apps? 1. Apple does not like apps in their app store calling other things apps. 2. It's confusing for consumers -- an app is something I download from the app store and is on my home screen. It doesn't live in another app. 3. New developers were confused by "frames", especially since v1 -> v2 frames were so different. This was a consistent piece of feedback. So, similar to Warpcast -> Farcaster simplification for consumers, we chose to frames -> mini apps (the thing that's comparable to Telegram, World, WeChat, etc.) 4. Again, there's a cadre of folks on Farcaster who are obsessed with names. Single syllables, "catchy" names. They don't matter. Google, Airbnb, ChatGPT were all phenomenally successful despite bad names (they sound fine now because you're familiar with them). * See note in next cast 5. Future: I suspect we will see companies that have an 1) app and 2) mini app. Use mini app to onboard and build habit and then upsell to the next app.
35 replies
29 recasts
248 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
"Google, Airbnb, ChatGPT were all phenomenally successful despite bad names (they sound fine now because you're familiar with them)." ^ this is the crucial insight. Any name that doesn't get in the way of itself will be absolutely fine, as long as the product gives lots of people something they genuinely want. (I remember everyone thought "Twitter" was weird too. Even when it was making its transition to being featured in mainstream news. But that quickly dissipated.)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction