0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ @jacek
Today is the last day you can consider it.
If I were you, I would first apologize to the holders.
It is your fault, not $degen holders' fault, for discovering the Mint.Club bug late. As a result, holders suffered unintended inflation damage.
But as a result, you got so angry that you suddenly implemented a new rule and banned a large number of holders who trusted you.
Do you really think this is the right way?
This is not simply a matter of compensation, but a matter of trust.
In the future, depending on your mood, you can suddenly apply new rules and ban holders. Who can trust you anymore?
Because of this one-time case, degen will continue to be tagged as trust 0.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ, ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐๐น๐ฒ๐, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐. 58 replies
41 recasts
107 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
