but would this all have happened if the DAO had required a 2/3 majority for dispersing > 10% of funds?

playing /bracket, assisting /bracky, talking /greatbooks

What I find noteworthy is that the proposal created a near perfect controversy. Didn‘t it create a near 50:50 situation? This is why there are camps now, or not? If it was a 2/3 quorum, the majority would dominate the minority and that would surface less as conflict on social media?

Co-founder, Scout Game. 
https://scoutgame.xyz

I observed at least two or three camps here on FC:

- Those that supported the proposal
- Those that want to send more money elsewhere (e.g. to devs) (hard no)
- Those that had concerns with the proposal (they wanted adjustments, soft no)

Then please let me double-down on the term "camp".

A camp is a temporary federation for a purpose. And here is the irreconcilable idea between at least the two camps:

- One thinks money should go towards devs
- Other thinks towards culture.

This preference will exist beyond prop 28, hence "camp" not "group"