timdaub (🥝,🎩)
@timdaub.eth
but would this all have happened if the DAO had required a 2/3 majority for dispersing > 10% of funds?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Interesting idea
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub (🥝,🎩)
@timdaub.eth
What I find noteworthy is that the proposal created a near perfect controversy. Didn‘t it create a near 50:50 situation? This is why there are camps now, or not? If it was a 2/3 quorum, the majority would dominate the minority and that would surface less as conflict on social media?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
I don’t sense there are “camps” bc imo 80% of voters (eg me) were just giving a quick opinion and could understand if others have a diff take But sounds like there might be st going on behind the scenes? 🤷🏼♂️ My take on it all: controversial votes > “fake niceness” victory lap votes
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions