timdaub
@timdaub.eth
I think if Farcaster wants to become the social status game of Ethereum‘s who is who, it needs to get rid of the Farcaster aristocracy. Otherwise, what status game is it implementing? Not clear to me
15 replies
2 recasts
6 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Who is the aristocracy?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Let me try to define it - you have a lot of followers on here - you have gained a majority of these followers by your social closeness to others that have a lot of followers here - the system has (at one point) recommended you more than others (e.g. invite lists, activity badge, Dan likes all of your posts)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I’m probably a part of the aristocracy. Happy to be a part of the solution, but what do you mean by remove them?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
removing them isn't necessary. But for the network to implement the "who is who" of the Ethereum fame game, those that have the most impact in Ethereum should end up receiving the most attention on Farcaster. The aristocracy can stay, but it should be ranked according to that mapping.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Sounds like an implementation at a client level, very possible.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction