Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
retroactive grants are cool but they require builders take on all the risk (build it and you *might* get *some* funding) an alternative ✨proactive✨ approach:
26 replies
16 recasts
86 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
I think there is a mistake in your thinking. I make vastly more money hourly than with Kiwi News and so my risk-free rate is incredibly high. But consider, in 99% or my freelance work, I do not retain ownership in my work, so I cannot gain from it after the fact. You have to factor this in.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
sorry where’s the mistake? what i’m proposing gives you the same amount of money per hour worked *and* ownership if you voluntarily work for a lower hourly rate then that’s on you
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Nobody will pay for my „risk-free“-level freelance work rate to build @kiwi while I retain full ownership. This is not a hypothetical argument, it is reality. When you freelance, the client takes on 99% of project risk and ownership, hence the high pay. When you retain ownership, that‘s part of your compensation.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
reread the proposal tim, i’m not suggesting you retain full ownership. by ✨sharing it✨ you incentivize others to also share in the risk
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
In your screenshot there is no detailed information about sharing ownership. How would that looks like? By splitting revenue as dividends?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
yes exactly https://blog.withfabric.xyz/contribution-tokens (agreed that could’ve been more clear)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction