timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Farcaster hasn‘t crossed Dunbar‘s number (150) for posting users yet and that is nuts. Basically we‘re just a big circle of friends where everybody knows each other! https://warpcast.com/greg/0x67fa4c
9 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's the data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14if_EgUNwO1FjuvihvHKvRXVYhCyAF8Bd9Ge_lzW8-E/
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
James McComish
@jamco.eth
Given the 150 most active pfps, how many do you reckon you could name?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
dunbar's number doesn't exist or is way higher than 150 stop advertising bad science and false facts
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
The “Dunbar number” is 150 relationships before groups break down — the number of people in a single group before it becomes hard to maintain the relationships It was first observed in offline companies and teams — and probably is too low a number for online social networks Now... longcast.jam.so/jjbATL
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
ha! I always felt like fc is giant groupchat(in a good way)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@benersing
Lol I like the “large slack group” feel.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andrew
@ak
I suppose I should post there more often then
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Question: is this a thing to be changed intentionally or does the change occur after enough is built naturally? I keep seeing these comments about people stressing the distribution of topics and people, but the goal right now is to build and support, not unleash growth…or am I wrong?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Blau 🎩
@joeblau
👉👈
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
