Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Consumer crypto is no longer limited by infrastructure. Just good enough ideas and great execution.
9 replies
10 recasts
57 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
well I would disagree there are def a bunch of infra problems, eg replicating embedded wallets without vendor lockin. For me this is a problem, for u it might not be bc u can scale the team more easily https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/open-source-alternatives-to-privy-web3auth-and-dynamic/20209?u=timdaub
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
macro vs. micro
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
wdym?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. Plenty of capital available for crypto startups. 2. Tools like Privy are rapidly improving for mainstream use cases. Understand you might want something different, but most entrepreneurs / use cases are fine with Privy.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
1. sure 2. I would integrate with privy but I think it is a critical business risk. If you wanna move away from it you‘ll have to start over. That‘s unnecessary down side risk. Without wanting to offend but entrepreneurs are only implementing if uninformed, have „send it“ mentality or same investor
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
Jumping in. That is v much not true of builders we work w. They just want to focus on their products and understand that rebuilding a secure system from scratch is extremely hard and not the best use of their time. From there, we guarantee users can always export wallets and use them even if Privy goes down (v soon).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
