Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
Depends on the person. If they’re primarily a TikTok or IG user, forget about it until FC is much bigger. If they’re on X or Facebook: - social network that can’t rug pull your community - ability to migrate apps without losing your community
2 replies
4 recasts
29 reactions

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Yeah but also there are subgroups of your first group who might come over. For example a lot of political accounts, citizen journalists, satirists, artists who make provocative works, especially queer artists and raconteurs (who are disproportionately shadowbanned on Insta and TikTok) who might come over to decentralized social apps and become a motivation for their followings to sign up as well
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
Good point. I was thinking more about the average passive user than people trying to build niche audiences. Seems like the latter could gradually motivate their fans to come with them.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Yeah. I agree with your points for sure. I often say that for many the decentralization aspect isn’t enough. But the thing about network effects is they’re really hard to predict because they tend to snowball. Like people don’t come over one by one but sort of in clusters
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
The other thing I was thinking about is the UX is extremely rich on tiktok & IG. FC needs specialized clients and imo they need to keep the degenerate crypto activity somewhat hidden to retain the average user.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction