Varun Srinivasan
@v
A note on "permanent" spam labels If you ignore the warning and get the spam label, it won't be removed until you show a long period of good behavior. This maybe several weeks or months until we re-evalaute your account and you've posted enough so that we know you're not spammy. (we are still building this system so its effectively permanent for now)
20 replies
7 recasts
43 reactions
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
hope that it starts light and gets progressively stricter only as the system gets better want to avoid a chilling effect where users are scared of interacting with larger accounts even if they're posting quality replies fwiw, I think about and write my replies to you and dan carefully, but don't expect (or receive) interaction most of the time. I'm not personally concerned about a spam label, but it would be sad for a new user to try and do something similar with {insert whatever popular user who's interesting but doesn't reply that often} and get marked. Might also want to consider if their replies generate sub-conversations that don't involve the original caster.
3 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
tknox.eth🟪🎩
@thompson
i dont quite understand why a sub-conversation would effect the original poster at all. like me responding to you...i know you better than the op...so im not "petrified to respond" and i say that half-jokingly. BUT if someone has something to say that they feel is important on a sub-convo...why should that have any effect at all on the op? first, it even tags you...so if it were for 'moxie' & (im genuinely asking you a question so its not) moxie goes to you...and if you answered...it would go to me from you, right? not from the op? and really do sub-convos count negatively towards that person (in this case...me)? idk, i dont think im worried about being labeled a spammer, but i do think they need to get on that verification process...this has gotten very ooc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
Sub conversations are good imo
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction