Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pugson
@pugson
i don't want unlimited character count for casts but it would be great to extend it to 560 right now... sometimes you just gotta say a few more words or another sentence.
19 replies
9 recasts
201 reactions
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Or at least you could compose the cast as large as you want and the client magically will split it into a cast thread. That would be awesome.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
pugson
@pugson
this would be a nice ux win @achal @gt
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Yes pretty please. Writing several casts is a nightmare right now. At least in the web client after you cast you get the snack bar offering you the option to view your new cast and continue from there. On the native app, you have to reload to see it, or even go back and forth to keep writing.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tim/vortac
@vortac
Yeah, we need threads. Compose then cast, not really sure about length-based auto-splitting, as creating a good thread is editorial work.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
totally, but this will help. Then we can think about AI or anything on those lines regarding how to make it fit perfectly, but for now, it will be awesome. Also, don't forget that @betashop.eth did this for his old Jam client.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
