ted (not lasso)
@ted
resisted being *that* person but woke up and chose violence: FC is so male coded that a) it can get tired, and b) i still spend significant time on insta + twitter for chick stuff instead of FC yes, the men here are infinitely better than the men on twitter BUT the dynamic will remain a challenge. /chicks channel plz
32 replies
7 recasts
86 reactions
Syed Shah🏴☠️🌊
@syed
I don't think there is a single person that disagrees. What's the solution? Is it chicks channel? Separate client? Is it just a bunch of smaller details? Is it just content? Curious what things come to mind for you as a deterrent or what things could improve this?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
some unbaked ideas: 1. /chicks channel to find each other and talk about common chick interests more easily 2. women are more receptive to apps dominated by photo/video vs text 3. try to engage *authentically* with chick content, even if it is replying "i don't get it" 4. prioritize chick invites, but only after #1
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Syed Shah🏴☠️🌊
@syed
1. If I think based on subreddits, chicks as a solitary channel turns into more of a zoo and a way to communicate between with guys asking questions to chicks which is interesting, but maybe not the most authentic area. Interest based is harder but more meaningful. 2. This would def be a fun area to brainstorm. 3. 🤝
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
re: 1, friendly reminder that this isn't reddit. as stated before, the men here are much better than men on twitter, reddit, etc. sure, interest-based channels are harder but also we don't know which channels would be highest demand by women until there is enough content from them to see what topics surface. catch 22.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
