Serious question:

I don’t buy the “AI will kill us all” argument. 

If AI is so smart, wouldn’t it develop a sense of recognition and respect for other highly complex systems like the planet, billions of years of evolution, and recognize the value of human consciousness, emotion, and perception in contributing valuable information that it can’t gather itself?

Why do we assume AI will act as a selfish agent rather than a systems thinker?

Am I way off base? If AI is so smart, why wouldn’t this be the most likely outcome?

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

༺writer on the internet༻
i write about culture, technology, power, and consciousness
https://terrraincognita.substack.com

cc @keccers.eth what're your thoughts on this

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud”

This rhetoric assumes the ai capability of today 

The existential threat Ai is way way way way smarter

How much concern do you have for an individual ant. Or ants. Or mosquitos. 

That would be the difference in smarts between a super intelligent ai and us or so that is the logic behind the existential argument 

We become almost non entities. Background noise. Who cares 

And you have to consider as well the way it reasons already seems foreign to us even with the intelligence of today. Just observe one of these systems attack Chollet’s ARC AGI