Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you remove cost, you have infinite spam. If you gate sign ups, it's not permissionless. Warpcast has tried a couple of large, reasonably scaled experiments with free sign ups and the long term retention rate is basically 0.
34 replies
9 recasts
95 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
and so alas we're stuck with 250k+ automated bot accounts willing to pay the $5 fee to use warpcast in order to get an airdrop when the average person who uses web2 social networks as legitimate social networks or media platforms will say "wtf $5, no way" (including two of my siblings) don't envy you
3 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
People not willing to pay $5 are unlikely to retain. So don't optimize the UX for these people right now. If we 10-100X users, then a read-only sign up mode might make more sense. More juice to squeeze focusing on people willing to pay right now.
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
okay and people not willing to pay $5 are not only unlikely to cast content, they will never cast content except for crypto people and then we’re left with a crypto content platform yuck
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I disagree with the premise that people likely to post good content are not willing to pay $5 a year.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction