Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you remove cost, you have infinite spam. If you gate sign ups, it's not permissionless. Warpcast has tried a couple of large, reasonably scaled experiments with free sign ups and the long term retention rate is basically 0.
28 replies
16 recasts
81 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
and so alas we're stuck with 250k+ automated bot accounts willing to pay the $5 fee to use warpcast in order to get an airdrop when the average person who uses web2 social networks as legitimate social networks or media platforms will say "wtf $5, no way" (including two of my siblings) don't envy you
3 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
People not willing to pay $5 are unlikely to retain. So don't optimize the UX for these people right now. If we 10-100X users, then a read-only sign up mode might make more sense. More juice to squeeze focusing on people willing to pay right now.
5 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
okay and people not willing to pay $5 are not only unlikely to cast content, they will never cast content except for crypto people and then we’re left with a crypto content platform yuck
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I disagree with the premise that people likely to post good content are not willing to pay $5 a year.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i disagree with that premise too? there are ofc people willing to pay $5 a year who will post good content
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction