Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
wait so the “FC is too centralized” team also happens to be the “bridges can only deposit assets on our protocol, not another” team which is also the “we’ll sponsor you, but you can’t build on WC” team that is also the “we have our own wallet, lending, stablecoin and social network” team? no? yes?
11 replies
5 recasts
81 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
forgot to add that this is also the “we want a woman to win crypto the game, but not a woman from farcaster” team oops hahah
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Mikado
@mikadoe.eth
Who are they and what's their platform?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️
@nir
I respect the point but have to counter with aave being absolutely incredible and way more decentralized than fc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pedro
@pedrowww
It's a little deeper than that. Aave's take on the Polygon proposal makes a lot of sense from a risk management perspective. Simply put, you can't use deposits without holders' consent (they haven't signed up for that), and by using your bridge assets, you expose a lot of protocols to bad debt if anything happens (cf Harmony bridge hack).
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
wait which team is this! fc is too centralized??????? lmao
4 replies
3 recasts
21 reactions
triumph
@triumph
can we have ted vs [redacted] at the next crypto fight night already
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
with enough time, everything becomes a smart account.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tomu
@tomu
do they actually tell you not to build on the centralized one? they must really believe in decentralization and open markets
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Normies gonna normie
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️
@nir
I think you’re confusing positive sum with decentralized js
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sniffchunkytits
@fetus69
Heart emoji
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
