ted (not lasso)
@ted
current perspective on DAOs: when everybody’s the judge, no one’s the judge.
10 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Nico.cast🐱
@n
In my experience no projects have succeeded without ownership. How do DAOs deal with accountability?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
working for a DAO will make you pretty bearish on group coordination and decision making
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
volleyball in the center of the court
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
💯💯💯 DAOs probably need to learn the lessons that “physical” organizations have learned over time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
coachcoale.eth 🎩
@coachcoale
Need to observe a decision rule: how will we make decisions, and how might that change/evolve depending on the need?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jamesyoung.eth
@jamesyoung
DAOs scale leadership
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Max
@maxg
@beb playground
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bruno Neves
@bruno
I think there should be a distinction between top level decisions vs. decisions open to DAO voting On top of that, there should be a road to decentralization rather than starting decentralized from 0 Would be a mistake to try to reinvent the wheel as far as orgs go. It should add on to a proven way to orgz ppl and
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry Hobin
@sir
Couldn’t have said it better myself. Establishing accountability is so hard in organizations without liabilities. The threat of the value of your tokens decreasing is not enough, and the 1:1 equity to governance ratio may not be ideal.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Homocryptus
@homocryptus
Shareholders ≠ managers Dao voters ≠ Dao builders
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
