Economics

does anyone else feel like $URA (uranium ETF that Freidberg talked about on All In pod) is a must investment as there is no nuclear representation in the S&P500?

nuclear is going to take up and the standard index fund won’t see any of the gains. how else can we get exposure to nuclear outside of private companies?

posting to /economics in case anyone has a take on this cc @giu @dwr.eth @julia

ps who else on farcaster is interested in future of energy?

President of Antares Industries. Mom to 2 little boys. Nuclear energy advocate. Formerly SpaceX and Opendoor. Angel investor. 

🇧🇷🇺🇸-  Book: Making Things Think: https://holloway.com/mtt. Investor in Wander, Carry, Footprint, Merkle Manufactory (Farcaster), Dynamic, Paragraph.

I had a video about this 3 years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEtgscaJBLg

If you invested in the stocks that I mentioned at the time, you made a lot of money.

Even though this was probably a great investment. I think there are easier and better opportunities in the long run

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

I did similar logic applied to Lithium a few years ago but the problem was that supply grow outpaced demand so price went down even though market cap/volume went up
So as Julia said can be better to buy the companies rather than the commodity 

energy

I think there has been some good content in /energy but I mainly say this because this is where I post my future of energy stuff

thank you! i love it when i see your pfp pop up here :)

cc @ktd good insights from a nuclear founder

Seems worth exploring! While not S&P500 there are some public nuclear companies like Cameco and BWXT (more established) and Oklo and Nano (advanced nuclear) that could be worth looking at too.

i worked in energy data forecasting but im out until internet rich