coins

try to argue against content coins from first principles.

if a video on tiktok has millions of views, it has value.

why should a single platform control that value?
why shouldn't that value be explicit?
why shouldn't the creator benefit from that value?

seems good to me.

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

one pushback here could be that the millions of tiktok views has value because  it means more people get to see the ads that are attached to it; the ad model is how tik tok monetizes 


> today; 100% of that money goes to the platform; instead, more should go to BOTH the user who saw the ad and the content creator.

lore @optimism | ex: @coinbase | views are my own | what if it all worked out? 

100% doesn’t go to the platform, that’s a fallacy and a misleading generalization of how creators monetize

in fact, there are instances when 0% goes to the platform: upfront brand deals, which are preferred by most creators

the part i have trouble with (until the behavior — or my understanding — scales) is that today I pay attention with my eyes not with my wallet

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud”

https://warpcast.com/binji.eth/0x2ad9f0b0