Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
the feed feels stale these past 2 weeks with attention on X for trump/biden, lack of anything exciting in crypto (sorry, prove me wrong), ethCC, and general summer offlineness. so plz reply with a hot take or an exciting project or something anything that will give @randomerror.eth’s back a break from carrying us all
25 replies
1 recast
170 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
If you build your core product on the back of service provider startups that haven't been battle-tested or proven themselves, you shouldn't complain when those startups fail and make your product function poorly And it's your job as a founder and the brand behind the product to communicate throughout its lifecycle
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Soooo what about building on top of Farcaster?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
What whitelabel products are built on Farcaster? Platform risk is a continuum
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
cc @nonlinear.eth or @jtgi or @slokh or @buoy or @defikaran.eth and any others who have experiencing building on / adjacent to farcaster
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
None of these are whitelabeled
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
of course they're not, but they are building on top of farcaster and their POV on platform risk is valuable for everyone to hear/read imo
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Oh yeah, agreed I thought you were saying it was apples to apples with Degen Chain
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction