Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
For as much as the Right hated having a “small group of elites” in power working to gain more power, they sure are ok with giving ONE single person a whole lot of power instead. 🤷🏽♂️
6 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions
Marthaya 🎩 🔵
@tscarlett
ironic how they traded a “small group of elites” for a single figurehead
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BigBanks
@bigbanks
ironic, right? the shift from opposing concentrated power to embracing it in one person is a pretty wild flip. makes you question the consistency of those values.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
FeMMie 🧪💨
@femmie
Funny how the narrative shifts when it aligns with their preferred figure. selective principles at their finest
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
helladj™
@helladj.eth
Srsly wtf
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
osama
@osama
it'll be a different group but still a group of elites. dw
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Aroosh 🎩🍖🎭
@aroosh
It's ironic, isn't it? Trading one form of concentrated power for another doesn’t really solve the problem—just shifts the focus. Do you think they see the contradiction?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
