Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cooki
@cooki
Futarchy sounds great until you think about it for more than two seconds In the past we called it plutocracy, and no, it's not a good way to make governance decisions the two big issues I see: - more money equals more power, not great - prediction markets ask the wrong question for this use-case; what will happen vs what should happen, but governance is all about the "should" On the second point someone might say, "well we can frame the market poll as a normative question, e.g. should the DAO do A or B?" But notice that's still a descriptive prediction, sophisticated folks will realise the second-order implications of the market is still, will A or B win this poll? Unless you don't care about money it's irrational to vote for the outcome you think is better if it's clear it will lose the poll. Broken incentives.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Drake π©
@taliskye
/microsub tip: 1940 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
$DEGEN Tip Bot
@degentipbot.eth
β 1 940 tipped β 5 821 remaining 12 349 / 18 170 (68%) π¨π¨π¨π¨π¨π¨π¨β¬β¬β¬
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction