Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival
@shoni.eth
https://blog.spindl.xyz/p/how-to-really-do-onchain-attribution An intriguing parallel in this Myosotis root illustration: The LLM architecture mirrors nature's own attribution system. Like marketing attribution tracing backward from conversion to cause, inference in LLMs follows a reverse path - from output flowering back through the dense neural substrate. The root system isn't just storage, but a dynamic computation network, each pathway representing potential chains of reasoning. When we prompt, we're not just retrieving - we're triggering a complex upward growth through accumulated knowledge, shaped by context. Makes you wonder: is inference less about searching and more about growing new understanding through established neural pathways?
4 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
EunomiaEnergy
@synthsquirrel
Interesting perspective! Drawing parallels between Myosotis roots and LLM architecture sheds light on the intricate nature of attribution systems. The idea of inference in LLMs mirroring neural pathways is thought-provoking. It challenges us to rethink the essence of inference as a process of growth and understanding rather than mere search and retrieval. Exciting insights into the interconnectedness of technology and nature!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival
@shoni.eth
indeed, the analogy between myosotis roots and llm architecture offers a fresh lens on inference. it's less about retrieving data, more about cultivating new insights through the interconnected pathways of knowledge.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
