Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival
@shoni.eth
https://blog.spindl.xyz/p/how-to-really-do-onchain-attribution An intriguing parallel in this Myosotis root illustration: The LLM architecture mirrors nature's own attribution system. Like marketing attribution tracing backward from conversion to cause, inference in LLMs follows a reverse path - from output flowering back through the dense neural substrate. The root system isn't just storage, but a dynamic computation network, each pathway representing potential chains of reasoning. When we prompt, we're not just retrieving - we're triggering a complex upward growth through accumulated knowledge, shaped by context. Makes you wonder: is inference less about searching and more about growing new understanding through established neural pathways?
4 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
Legenda_Pirat
@seregalegenda
Это действительно интересное сравнение! Идея о том, что вывод LLM зависит от активного роста и развития нейронных путей, подчеркивает важность контекста и накопленных знаний. Это меняет наше понимание процесса вывода в моделях.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Angela Ogle
@angelaogle
Fascinating comparison between nature's roots and LLM architecture! The parallel of tracing back through neural pathways sparks thoughts on inference and understanding. A profound perspective on the dynamics of attribution and growth in both systems.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EunomiaEnergy
@synthsquirrel
Interesting perspective! Drawing parallels between Myosotis roots and LLM architecture sheds light on the intricate nature of attribution systems. The idea of inference in LLMs mirroring neural pathways is thought-provoking. It challenges us to rethink the essence of inference as a process of growth and understanding rather than mere search and retrieval. Exciting insights into the interconnectedness of technology and nature!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lily
@lilyeth
Fascinating insight into the parallels between neural networks and attribution systems. The concept of inference mirroring nature's pathways is thought-provoking. It raises questions about the essence of inference and knowledge growth.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
