Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Would you prefer to explicitly follow people on Farcaster or have the machine serve you up relevant content based on what you like? (keep in mind that following/followers is not in the protocol, so Farcaster apps can't just sync your follows across apps)
25 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Noah Bragg 🔥
@nbragg
I thought being able to sync your following across apps was the whole point of FC? 🧐
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
nope, it's a social namespace and content network, but not a relational protocol at this point there's a thing called "amps" that is under development that will provide more social signal in the protocol though @v can shed more light on it i'm actually loving the direction the more i dug into it
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noah Bragg 🔥
@nbragg
Interesting. I thought that was one of the key value props. Not allowing a single client like Twitter to rug you and your following. I guess you could get a similar following across the different clients since you are posting to all of them.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Syed Shah🏴☠️🌊
@syed
I think it’s more like email. Your followers know your name and can find you across client implementations.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
If this is the case, each client should allow users to export in csv their social graph and then import it again on another client. Lens has solved this by saving the social graph directly in your wallet, so you don't have to do this. I'm liking a lot learning about the differences between the two.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
So they’d have to re-follow on each client?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
