Jason Goldberg ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ pfp
Jason Goldberg ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ
@betashop.eth
Would you prefer to explicitly follow people on Farcaster or have the machine serve you up relevant content based on what you like? (keep in mind that following/followers is not in the protocol, so Farcaster apps can't just sync your follows across apps)
22 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Do you plan to make the chain algorithm transparent in some way so that I will understand how it chooses things and how I can tweak it? Thatโ€™d be very web3.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noah Bragg ๐ŸŸ pfp
Noah Bragg ๐ŸŸ
@nbragg
I thought being able to sync your following across apps was the whole point of FC? ๐Ÿง
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

aleena pfp
aleena
@aleena
I prefer it being content forward for the serendipity of discovery (vs seeing the same ppl in new places)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
both ....? should be clear which feed im on.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
Both
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
OK, I see I made an over confident incorrect statement elsewhere. ๏ฟผAnyways, yeah I appreciate machine suggestions, but having the ability to explicitly by decide who I follow is a matter of self determination Iโ€™m not keen to give up.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ken Burbary pfp
Ken Burbary
@kenburbary
Both. The discovery process isn't 100% organic IMHO.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Scott pfp
Scott
@scottw
A social graph is great but only an algorithmic interest graph can truly scale. A decision about user experience. Iโ€™d prefer different UIs for each.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yassine Landa pfp
Yassine Landa
@yassinelanda.eth
You might want the machine to personalise both actually. Even for follow, which one you show first based on whatโ€™s latest/hot/interest etc - session time might be smaller that total follow read time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brent Fitzgerald pfp
Brent Fitzgerald
@bf
Iโ€™m tired of the machine.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Avi ๐Ÿ’™ pfp
Avi ๐Ÿ’™
@savvyavi
Thatโ€™s a tough one. Iโ€™m so intentional about who I follow. But Iโ€™d the machine learn my preferences the way tiktok does (or Artifact has after a month on the platform) then I would say machine. Chances are the folks I follow will be ranked there anyhow.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

welter.eth pfp
welter.eth
@fun
explicity follow, i also limit who i follow, probably just me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Depends on which app Iโ€™m using. Warpcast, Iโ€™d rather curate the list of folks whose content I want to subscribe to (and also DC, if needed and infrequently). Other apps - Iโ€™d want machine recommendation and smart search.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben Oโ€™Rourke pfp
Ben Oโ€™Rourke
@bpo
I actually prefer to make lists for different contexts
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben Oโ€™Rourke pfp
Ben Oโ€™Rourke
@bpo
Thatโ€™s what the following and highlights tab does for me - gives me the best of both worlds
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chu Ka-Cheong pfp
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
I actually like seeing quality posts from people I didnโ€™t follow on topics that I explicitly expressed interested, especially when they have opposite arguments, as long as they not clickbait or engagement farming.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mark Carey ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿซ‚ pfp
Mark Carey ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿซ‚
@markcarey
Interesting. I didnโ€™t realize that followers were not part of the protocol. I need do a deep diveโ€ฆ definitely having โ€œthe machine โ€œ play a role in surfacing quality content that is relevant to me is valuable, if done well (which is the hard part, I suspect)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adrian pfp
Adrian
@maurerbot
I like how Reddit does it. https://i.imgur.com/lO9X8qd.jpg
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Definitely both. I donโ€™t like the idea of getting rid of the following mechanism
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction