curious what other DAOers are thinking or feeling given the recent shut down of DAOs that are "default dead" (eg DAO Masters, Meta Gamma Delta). 

thought provoking thread: twitter.com/JuliaLipton/status/1683535162808717312

cc @ccarella.eth @noun40 @nounishprof @nonlinear.eth @bli @grin

Building @frens | @orangedao | @a16zcrypto CSS

building /cabin (cabin.city). founder of LBRY.com, odysee.com, vibe.camp, /farcon. more at grin.io

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/ 

curious what other DAOers are thinking or feeling given the recent shut down of DAOs that are "default dead" (eg DAO Masters, Meta Gamma Delta). 

thought provoking thread: twitter.com/JuliaLipton/status/1683535162808717312

cc @ccarella.eth @noun40 @nounishprof @nonlinear.eth @bli.eth @grin

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

IMHO a major problem in many DAOs’ give/get has to do with

- lack of autonomy to do great work (repels top performers)

- lack of efficiency fails to achieve large outcomes, so the pie is small, and any % of a small pie is a small get

Agree with the lack of autonomy to do great work. Seems like a lot of this comes from other “trust less” parts of the crypto ecosystem. 

And in some DAOs the original membership wasn’t values aligned at all (aside from degen principles to see numbah go up).

And very active DAOs are noisy as hell != efficiency