Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
This is the most interesting thing I've read on Twitter this entire month. I didn't know this but apparently Fox surprisingly did a better job of covering the Palestinian genocide than liberal media. This is the analysis behind why. https://x.com/JKSteinberger/status/1844620434047660183
3 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

swampnet.base.eth pfp
swampnet.base.eth
@swampnet
About to read this but I did notice this unfortunately. I would never touch the New York Times again, not even with a 10 foot poll.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
Yeah 100% - to be clear what I found interesting in the thread was more the Fox part and less the lib media, and of course the general analysis of how media is so much shaped by the cemented factors (that Fox is not as much bound to "self-perceived moral high ground" and therefore also not as much bound to having to admit being wrong all along in this conflict)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

thoughtcrimeboss pfp
thoughtcrimeboss
@thoughtcrimeboss
I read the times religiously for years, at some point though the decreased quality of journalism and bias became so obvious I just couldn't handle it anymore. If we don't even have a valid newspaper of record any more what are we left with?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction