- ‘H' = "humanity’s survival"
- 'P' = "problem solving”
- 'D' = "statistical diversity”

1. Assume H is good
2. Assume D increases the chance of P
3. Assume P is necessary for H
4. Therefore, it can be inferred that D is necessary for likelihood of H

diversity is necessary for survival.

therefore diversity is good. do what increases healthy diversity.

diversity = biological, ideological, technical, cultural, geographical, neurological, etc.

a fragmented Ethereum can’t scale // product marketing @espressosys // prev marketing work @coinbase @darkblock // 10+ yrs in biz journalism // dad x2 👨‍👦‍👦

320 characters is very limiting. go ahead and list them and we'll walk through them.

Operator turned investor. Work in TradFi. Exploring the future of social investing @crossroads.  🟪

great question. that comes into play on the second cast with "therefore diversity is good." a truly good logical argument should be a lot longer than this with many more premises.

Interesting framework. I agree.

Where does "1. Assume H is good" fit into the equation? It doesn't seem to have any influence on the rest of the variables.