sean
@swabbie.eth
it seems like all the arguments against funding BLVCKHAND due to "xx% of the treasury is too high" miss the point of an org like @purple. often fewer, more impactful initiatives are needed to make a difference. perhaps ~10% of the treasury should be the standard minimum to encourage more purposeful initiatives.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
whenever large spending is involved there must be clear definitions of success and failure, accountability, traceability, and then learning from successes and failures just throwing money at initiative is not enough, marketing is more involved than that for instance: what metric is tried to be improved? by how much?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean
@swabbie.eth
for sure. lots of improvements to make.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
these are *obvious* and *necessary* improvements that must be done *before* 12% of the treasury is spent, not after this is the issue with most @purple members "good suggestions, lots of improvements to make, you're heard, room to grow" no, i wasn't heard — these things need to be implemented now, not later
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean
@swabbie.eth
someone is needed to lead the implementation.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
after i saw the sentiment of current @purple members (who hold more tokens than an average person) towards @purpler i kinda feel like the people who must lead would have never done it i'm almost happy we went with @purpler i now see that @purple doesn't want these changes — it would be impossible to fight them
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
