Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Founder Mode is such great tech navelgaze bait - It’s vague - Everyone in tech feels like they have a relevant opinion - Most are part wrong bc unintuitive - No chance of counterfactual experiments - Insiders can LARP expertise bc only ~300 people worldwide have an evidence based take It’s the perfect storm.
14 replies
3 recasts
34 reactions
sean 🔹
@swabbie.eth
it's psychologically effective for increasing high-risk innovative building, which has been a key ingredient to our societal success
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
how do you define when a company should/shouldn't enter FM?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
sean 🔹
@swabbie.eth
lots of intangibles. i think you're right, there is no clear definition. that is why it works.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
tbh i *agree* with PG and you where i differ is that i sorta think that if we genuinely believe this is true and real then... we should probably have government funded pools of capital to take on even higher volatility challenges haha
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sean 🔹
@swabbie.eth
yea the problem is to do that you need to do what you asked - define founder mode, and i agree with PG that trying to define it or artificially implement it will fail
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
