Sven
@svenh
🥕Daily incented.co Elevator Pitch 🛗📣 Please provide candid feedback and ask questions. No need to sugarcoat. 🍭🥼 https://youtu.be/6kdYeV5pMXQ
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
After listening to it several times, my biggest open question was around the second piece of the problem statement: "what impact does the funding have?" You reference it only once that I can tell, at the end with a quick comment about how the community maybe rates how well they built the thing? Not sure. Good stuff tho
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sven
@svenh
Thats very helpful. I constantly toe the line between too little and too much detail. Essentially the projects will build on the protocol with their users and / or the community constantly prioritizing tasks/features/milestones and validating their delivery though the staking mechanism. ⬇️
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Sven
@svenh
Since those actions are on chain, we can then start looking at things like Task Velocity, Community Engagement, etc. And automatically create signals to the funders. E.g. if one project starts dipping in engagement, maybe it isn't a monetary issue, and the funders could help in other ways. ⬇️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
That makes sense. Relistening to it now I hear what you're saying about the staking mechanism throughout the lifecycle. Perhaps adding more emphasis in that sentence, something like: "...involve your community in the entire grant lifecycle utilizing live feedback from the staking mechanisms to provide the carrot..."
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
