🥕Daily Pitch #3 - Incented .co
Provide feedback and ask questions. You won't hurt my feelings. 😭😄

🥕Daily Pitch #3 - Incented .co
Provide feedback and ask questions. You won't hurt my feelings. 😭😄
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhX_Vd_jRsU

Fixing Coordination🥕@ https://Incented.co
Talking DAOs 💬 @ https://DAODeepDives.com
Off Gridding 🐺 @ https://coyote.wtf

I don't know if I've seen all of them so maybe you did this in a previous one, but you already started getting into what I was thinking about today:

Then current methods: "send& forget" or Retroactive funding?

Spell it out exactly what we're currently doing and why it's not working. Too aggressive? I'm curious.

Decentralizing infrastructure with Kleomedes |

Building collaboration with Nearchos |

/octant Community Grants Council |

/colinks-and-co CoDAO Council

Cool, will try to be more specific. In a longer convo I sometimes mention the buzzwordy way to think about Incented: 
"Escrowed, Task Level, Retroactive Funding"

YES... We very strongly believe that it needs to be flexible on the protocol level. There are two core interactions. 
1. Contributory (e.g. write a proposal, do the work, etc.)
2. Confirmatory (Stake to prioritize or validate, etc.)
Those can be plugged together in any order to build a flow that works for the community

Also, I will totally use "Programmable Accountability" from now on. :)

What I really like about incented is the ability to be more hybrid. There can be more upfront payment to start the task, or more retroactive funding at the end for delivery, based on the desires of the community in terms of how they structure the individual milestones and payments. Programmable accountability.