Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

@krel any specific pointers on what makes prop feel drafty? Guess needs a 5th rewrite lol 

or if others are confused about anything?

(might be first case of a third party attempting to fund another team w/o coordination ?)

@krel any specific pointers on what makes prop feel drafty? Guess needs a 5th rewrite lol 

or if others are confused about anything?

(might be first case of a third party attempting to fund another team w/o coordination ?)

https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/stake-1k-in-rounds-32d1a53f6709a03f4b6cf4cb0501204ba188d4f5

For me it was a couple of things:

- wasnt clear if the prop was about securing rounds future, or preventing a fork or securing $nouns future or all of those. It probably should do more things. 

- Rounds is very promising. But i don’t know if the prop goes deep into why “3mil$” worth promising. (It digresses)

Founder @ /atrium  (atrium.art) . Making nouns.movie ⌐◨-◨

my bad. i meant probably shouldn’t ** do more things. Should be focused on rounds if thats the goal. rest is just making auxiliary points diluting the prop or information overload

i think if the main point was a poison pill w.r.t $nouns liquidity then yes. 
I did feel that rounds being the "best" candidate to custody got lost or subdued and poison pill took the center stage in the prop.

Was the explanation of the problem w $nouns liquidity clear? Prop is really integrating both and trying to be transparent about the value of a poison pill and why rounds is best candidate to custody . 
Maybe will add that by giving to rounds it means funds will ultimately accessible by all builders