anon
@superanon
missing the forest for the trees. if we had permissionless anon downvotes, there wouldn't even need to be mid anon content at all. but no, cabal needs their thumb on the scale, and can't take the upfront reputational challenge. even @dwr.eth recognizes that CT OGs had no upfront challenge to farm clout, because all bagholders like their posts by default. lock in a legitimate contest and another pressure bleeder, or stick with the "this is fine" bs
2 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
JR ↑
@juli
How’s an anon post anon when you know all the people liking it? Cross reference & analyze other posts, metadata and you can with high certainty conclude who’s written what. Yes, I’d like Reddit style up and down voting and discovery of good posts too
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
anon
@superanon
this is the deepest frustration I have with Ethereum in particular. think about how much $$$ NK has funneled through tornado. they own that anonset. do whites & grays respond with some d/acc casino game that dilutes the anonset? same with OC you QC'd. if the norm was high tolerance of reputational risk, everyone liking no matter what, then the cheerleader effect would check all the pieces of work everyone is so quietly afraid of.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
anon
@superanon
imagine yapping about WWIII-resistance while looking the other way as degens dump casinos that pay one of the biggest catalysts for WWIII. https://x.com/JimmyRagosa/status/1877275080335524072
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
