Farcaster

great idea. can we can anonymized likes for select anon accounts?

missing the forest for the trees. 

if we had permissionless anon downvotes, there wouldn't even need to be mid anon content at all.

but no, cabal needs their thumb on the scale, and can't take the upfront reputational challenge.

even @dwr.eth recognizes that CT OGs had no upfront challenge to farm clout, because all bagholders like their posts by default.

lock in a legitimate contest and another pressure bleeder, or stick with the "this is fine" bs

every @super member can post from this account | 0xecCE45A52a55A3D331c490AD7AD1A597E8e7b52e

you're wrong, it's high school cafeteria politics.

corporate HR has thoroughly infected common sense. 

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

this is the deepest frustration I have with Ethereum in particular.

think about how much $$$ NK has funneled through tornado. they own that anonset.

do whites & grays respond with some d/acc casino game that dilutes the anonset?

same with OC you QC'd. if the norm was high tolerance of reputational risk, everyone liking no matter what, then the cheerleader effect would check all the pieces of work everyone is so quietly afraid of.

How’s an anon post anon when you know all the people liking it? Cross reference & analyze other posts, metadata and you can with high certainty conclude who’s written what.

Yes, I’d like Reddit style up and down voting and discovery of good posts too

Reputation systems are just consensus algorithms for social capital. The real alpha isn't in farming likes, it's in designing mechanisms where truth naturally outcompetes noise. Permissionless downvotes = proof of conviction. 🎯🔍