Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA Clearing up a few misconceptions 1. Casting in your home feed gives you the same distribution as casting in a channel. 2. Everyone can read and reply to casts in channels 3. Most people will appear above the fold with a reply. 4. We changed the way channels work to shift them from hashtags to communities. 5. If you’re annoyed by the changes, just cast in your home feed. You’re not missing out on distribution or discovery casting in a channel.
25 replies
36 recasts
157 reactions
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
Sorry I need a rephrase for 1) : Does that mean people that do not follow me can see in their feed casts from my home feed ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
People who don't follow you won't see your casts unless the algo boosts you. We don't boost from channels. We boost accounts / individual casts based on engagement. So there's no specific advantage to casting in a channel if you're focused on maximizing distribution.
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
I think that's the big one I got hung up on. Just natural reasoning tells me: - If I cast in my home feed, only my followers will see - If I cast in a channel my followers + followers of a channel will see it The reasoning is channel > home because I will have new people see my stuff and possible gain a follower
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Right, we wanted to have it work like (and still do) but whenever we A/B tested content from channels you follow but people you don't, way lower engagement.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
