Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
the confusion is self-induced and avoidable
2 replies
3 recasts
23 reactions

Andrei O. pfp
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
LOL, DWR said that Bluesky is far more centralized than Warpcast/Farcaster. Maybe it is because nobody puts in the resources to run other networks, but everything about how BlueSky works is open. Everything is open source, feeds can be created by anybody, and GitHub and Discord communities are far more vibrant and open. It is absolutely a joke to state that Farcaster/Warpcast is more transparent, Warpcast is the definition of opaque, everything that is now open was spooned open bit by bit, and Bluesky had everything open from the get-go.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
lol i think he was referring to the underlying data (hubs vs PDS), which tbh just has different trade offs and doesn't actually affect the state of decentralization from a user's point of view doesn't matter if my cast is sitting on 1000 different hubs if it doesn't show in warpcast
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> doesn't matter if my cast is sitting on 1000 different hubs if it doesn't show in warpcast But all the data is open and permissionless and not sitting on a single company's server. So why you have seen Farcaster protocol data organically show up in many other applications.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction