Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
what if storage fees were rebated if the fid's contribution to the network is valuable? (obviously by some subjective metric) storage fees don't contribute to the actual storage of the data, so if you consider it a "spam prevention stake" this could help apps cover onboarding fees for new users they are confident will contribute positively to the network could even turn this into an incentive mechanism - if a user doesn't "contribute positively" to the network within X weeks then they don't qualify for a rebate - these leftover fees are then somehow distributed to referrers/onboarders so you can earn a profit onboarding high quality farcaster users
5 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
redbeard
@hbrbssa.eth
agreed. i think v similar to what we have seen the l2 space w.r.t seq fees grants, subsidizing gas, creator rewards, creating rewarding are all interesting approaches.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
patxol đź”· anser.social
@patxol.eth
I think in the future storage fees will be sponsored by brands for their customers. Sign in on Farcaster with the Nike app, get free storage, automatically follow @ and / nike
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
But if your fid "contribution to the network is valuable" you most likely think that $7/year is money well spent, right?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Blinky Stitt
@flashprofits.eth
Subjective metrics don't translate into decentralized cryptocurrencies. Crypto depends on math
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
🙌 💯 Let’s start with the hub operators & call it a monthly airdrop. 🤣 Kidn not kidn. We can’t forget the people with the largest hard costs. There’s $2.1 million in the protocol treasury. Before we accelerate the already bloated protocol with full time hires (Boyle’s Law), let’s first implement a reward system for the most valuable participants. https://dune.com/pixelhack/farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
