Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sten🧢
@sten
fantasy curriculum, gonna test it in some classes in ‘24, v keen for feedback https://mirror.xyz/kirstenbevin.eth/UTqRxL4dNycGv7oowat0SFo53eRpzYL7SCCz4AFn6mw
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Sam
@sammdec.eth
Love this but I wonder if there is a way to go further, you mention pushing past just “pretty” gen art and uncovering systems, making immaterial, material. What other areas could be taught e.g. interconnecting functionality, websockets, social layers
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sten🧢
@sten
thank u, really good point, emphasising the art situated in its web context with web possibilities.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sammdec.eth
Yeah exactly, modern gen art is often now comprised for a web medium and part of that medium is that its social/inter connectedness at its core I feel like there is a small set of artists who explore this inter connectedness with the other variables to produce compelling pieces but would love to hear more
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@sammdec.eth
However, I do think that it doesn’t necessarily need to be locked to web only, maybe the mechanisms can be generalised. Lauren Lee McCarthy and Casey Reas have setup the UCLA Social Software initiative which looks interesting at what social software and gen art have in common
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
sten🧢
@sten
interesting challenge to unfold social mechanisms from the NFT ‘💀 we r a community 🔪’ tornado. do u think best case studies are artworks where the whole project structure is a relational connection between many owners / parts into a greater whole? Terraforms an obvious example here!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam
@sammdec.eth
Ah yeah, I meant social aspects being part of the generative part rather than purely ownership part but I guess ownership could always be part of that mechanism. Yeah terraforms is a great one but also do like pieces like hash marks by deafbeef that has a certain ownership mechanism
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
