Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
erica
@erica
Without knowing the context of this screen, it’s hard to give fully accurate feedback but: > sequential process but you can go back any # of steps to refresh or adjust > lack of visual hierarchy > inconsistent typography (weight, colour, and letter spacing) > inconsistent distribution of steps (spacing) /1
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Stas
@stas
Thanks @erica, I agree that the original post is taken off the context. Appreciate if you could share your thoughts on the actual screen at https://aerodrome.finance/swap ❤️
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
erica
@erica
Seeing it in context, my feedback would still apply! It does have potential to create confusion or misunderstandings Most important feedback to consider is: highlighting warning states & visual hierarchy of values vs labels Also reconsider the layout, that info isn’t a sequential process but it looks like one
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stas
@stas
What does suggest the process isn't sequential?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
erica
@erica
Well these are hypothetical calculations, right? They haven't actually happened yet as I haven't initiated a tx Super important info is being grouped in with status messages and given the same visual weight Price impact is not a step, it's a measure /1
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
