Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
w-g
@w-g
would be great to have an inline way to delegate rounds-eligible post rewards to another user, or, ideally, something like: -if post has replies, rewards flow to most-liked replies (other than self) -otherwise distributed to remaining participants in round may be in a unique situation but: for me the priority is motivating engagement around difficult topics and would like the economics of rounds to better align with that goal.
4 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
SQX
@sqx
I stopped participating in /rounds . I don’t particularly like how it surfaces things.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
w-g
@w-g
Wdyt is the issue
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
SQX
@sqx
inability to give up control to save the masses from themselves. warp cast by definition of the algo is a popularity game. there are no curbs or handicaps in place. if anything. those who can are king makers. did you know warpcast has new accounts auto follow 70 or so accounts? i prefer to vibe freely than post and get no rewards. cause isn't that the same as saying my posts are worthless?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
w-g
@w-g
y some real challenges. tbh am neutral-to-bearish warpcast & even farcaster as ultimate wrapper for rounds. Trying to support the approach the team is taking if they feel they have most to learn by following the near-term energy . idk if popularity contest is such a dirty word as long as the signal is continually being sharpened (ie algos work to break apart bias rather than reinforce) but agree this is not the norm. long term I don’t think nouns will be able to count on anyone doing the hard work (wrt social graph design/maintenance..if those are the right words) for us. & ya already feels like monetization-free zones are the new off-grid or smthng
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
