daos

>99% of human coordination is subjective, which public blockchains cannot parse at all

This is why "DAOs" use traditional human governance methods which have nothing to do with blockchains (except for accounting, which is the only objective thing)

Ironically, if "DAOs" were autonomous, you wouldn't need "DAOs"

There are ways to use blockchains / smart contracts to implement subjective coordination. In fact, one thing that makes DAOs unique relative to any other org type is their ability to enforce their own rules with the full spectrum of enforcement from constraints/objective/prospective to accountability/subjective/retrospective.

These mechanisms and patterns are just starting to emerge, and it’s an exciting time.

building /hatsprotocol | 
proudly mid-curving it since 1995

I could have been clearer. I didn’t mean that blockchains or smart contracts can, without human input, execute subjective logic. 

What i do mean is that you can use smart contracts to autonomously run objective rules for how humans engage subjectively, and that is a hugely under-rated innovation and an (increasingly less) under-explored design space.

It's not possible because smart contracts are strictly objective - we know this from the thousands of DAOs over the last decade which require exclusively human input into all subjective matters

The only way is if there's an AGI coded into a smart contract, but blockchains will be obsolete well before then anyway